At this point in the resolution-heavy month, many of us may be trying to shed pounds, either the ones we added during the holidays or the ones we’ve accumulated stealthily with time. But by the end of the year, most of us won’t have succeeded — and there’s not much established science to tell us why.
An ambitious new study published this month in Cell Systems, however, promises to shed some new light, enumerating for the first time the thousands of changes in genes and various biological systems that may occur after even a small amount of weight gain, and which may — or may not — be reversed if the weight is then dropped. The findings may help researchers better understand why adding weight causes some people to develop diabetes and other conditions, and also underscore the cumulative health risks of so-called yo-yo dieting.
An international consortium of scientists approached 23 overweight men and women who were already part of a large, continuing study — called an “omics” study in the parlance of researchers — that examines participants’ genomes and microbiomes and generates vast amounts of data about the workings of the body.
But an “omics” study had never looked at the effects of weight change. After taking blood and other samples from their volunteers, the scientists asked the men and women to overeat. All of them began the study overweight; about half were insulin-resistant, which is often a precursor to diabetes. For a month, they added on average 880 calories a day to their diets and gained an average of about six pounds.
The scientists then asked the volunteers to cut calories and lose that new weight, which took most of them at least twice as long as the gaining had. After more samples, the researchers asked participants to keep their weight stable and return after another three months for a final round of tests.
In those tests, the scientists found many biological changes related to weight change. They found that 318 genes worked differently after most subjects had gained even a little weight. Some genes were more active, while others were effectively turned off. Many of these genes are thought to be involved in fat metabolism.